|
THE CAMPAIGN FOR THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF AMERICAN BASES (CAAB) |
![]() Carlos Bongioanni / S&S Lance Cpl. Maximilian Lopez, left, and Lance Cpl. Edward Wood use an electronic scope to adjust the receiving functions of an AN/TPS-59V3 Radar used in Afghanistan to monitor air traffic and aid in command and control. ![]() Carlos Bongioanni / S&S Lance Cpl. Maximilian Lopez inspects an AN/TPS-59V3 Radar used in Afghanistan to monitor air traffic and aid in command and control. ![]() Carlos Bongioanni / S&S Sgt. James Buchanan flips on the power inside a 20-foot long by 7-foot wide tactical air operations module used in Afghanistan to monitor air traffic and aid command and control. |
MARINE CORPS AIR STATION FUTENMA, Okinawa — Human eyes need a few seconds
to adjust to the darkness inside the metal box. The lead-gray walls of the 7-by-20 tactical air operations module seem to
absorb the overhead fixtures’ dim light. A narrow passageway, with
sophisticated floor-to-ceiling communications racks flanking both sides, opens
to the container’s back half, which is crammed with four computer consoles. At one, the screen’s glow lit Cpl. Steven Williams’ face as he watched
green radar blips flash up and fade away. No operating “outside the box”
for Williams: Only within the metal module can he see the blips, each
representing an object flying through a closely monitored air space. The Marine is a tactical air traffic controller and surveillance
identification director with the Futenma-based Marine Air Control Squadron 4.
The computers are connected electronically to powerful, ground-based radars
that “paint” the horizon with invisible radio-wave particles. The AN/TPS-
59 radar can detect anything flying within 300 miles. Controllers such as Williams identify, classify and track all detected
objects and pass the data to the theater’s command-and-control centers,
giving commanders an overall “operational picture” of their air space. Based on that information, commanders could scramble fighters to engage
enemy aircraft entering the space or direct ground control intercept units to
fire ground-to-air missiles to down aircraft or incoming missiles. Tactical air traffic controllers also “deconflict” the air space toward
ensuring friendly aircraft don’t collide. They help fighters, bombers and
transport aircraft coordinate times and locations to meet tanker aircraft for
refueling. For more than a year, MACS-4 members have provided such services to support
operations against Taliban and al-Qaida forces in Afghanistan. One detachment
remains at Karshi Khanabad, Uzbekistan, but another from Kandahar Airfield —
where Williams spent nine of the past 12 months — has returned to Okinawa. Don’t expect many travel photos, though: While in Afghanistan, MACS-4
members spent their entire time within a two-mile radius of their detachment
site. They never left the airfield or saw the countryside, said Capt. Mike
Hicks, the detachment’s executive officer for six months. An average workday lasted about 10 hours, including briefings and
debriefings book-ending eight-hour shifts inside the ops module. The job got
stressful, Hicks said, during major operations when numerous coalition
aircraft were providing fire support for troops or bombing enemy mountain
hideouts. But mostly, the captain said, “monotony was the toughest hardship.” Staying focused hour after hour, day after day for months is “mentally
challenging,” acknowledged Williams. “We’ve got very experienced people who don’t blink but twice in an
eight-hour shift,” he joked. No one joked, however, about the stakes: the mission, and troops’ lives. “This is serious business,” Williams said. “It’s intense,
especially when you think of the grunt on the ground. “You don’t want to do any blue-on-blue stuff,” he said, referring to
a 2002 incident in which two U.S. F-16 pilots bombed a Canadian unit near
Kandahar, killing four and injuring eight. For most of its deployment at Kandahar, the MACS-4 unit supplemented
coverage provided by U.S. and British Airborne Warning and Control Systems
aircraft. In January, as war in Iraq loomed, most AWACS coverage over Afghanistan
shifted elsewhere. After that, as to the job of providing primary coverage,
said Lt. Col. Gilbert Gonzalez, who took command of MACS-4 in December, his
unit “pretty much had it all.” The Afghanistan and Uzbekistan deployments initially were a morale booster,
he said, because they were outside MACS-4’s normal “area of
responsibility. … We could have sat at home as spectators the entire time.
Instead, we were participants.” His troops got to help clear Taliban forces from their mountain
strongholds. But among their most noteworthy accomplishments, he said, was
keeping the unit’s AN/TPS-59 radar turning almost continuously for 18
months. MACS-4 deployed to Guam two days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks to help defend the United States and U.S. territories. From there,
many went directly to Kandahar in April 2002. Several rotations of unit
members kept the radar turning for another 12 months. Once operations in Iraq wound down, an Air Force unit replaced the Marines
in Kandahar. News of the replacement came as a relief, said Gonzalez; never
knowing when they were coming home was the toughest part. “There was no end in sight,” he said. “Now we’re waiting to see
when we’ll get back our guys in Uzbekistan.” MACS-4 troops saw U.S., British, Canadian, Romanian and Jordanian units
come and go, Williams said. “We were there so long, many people were surprised to hear we were
leaving. They thought we were a permanent fixture.”